Minggu, 31 Agustus 2014

DealBook: Barclays to Sell Retail and Corporate Bank Units to CaixaBank of Spain

Barclays said on Sunday it had agreed to sell its retail and corporate banking business in Spain to CaixaBank for 800 million euros, or $1.05 billion, the latest development in the British bank's plan to streamline itself by selling non-core businesses.

The Spanish unit, Barclays Bank SAU, includes 2,400 employees across 262 branches, and the price CaixaBank is paying represents a steep discount to the unit's net asset value of 1.7 billion euros.
While Barclays was profitable in its most recent quarter, the British bank has continued to struggle with a host of large fines and regulatory issues both at home and in the United States. The bank has also seen a number of high level departures this year.

The sale of the Spanish unit, which includes retail banking, wealth and investment management and corporate banking businesses. It does not include investment banking or credit card operations.

Barclays also said on Sunday it would record a gain of around 119 million pounds, or $197 million, after completing the sale of its retail business in the United Arab Emirates to Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank.

"I am pleased to be announcing further progress on Barclays non-core asset reductions through the transactions announced today," Antony Jenkins, Barclays group chief executive, said in a statement in London on Sunday. "We remain on track to rebalance Barclays as part of our strategy to deliver sustainable returns for our shareholders."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3e062cd4/sc/24/l/0Ldealbook0Bnytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C310Cbarclays0Eto0Esell0Eretail0Eand0Ecorporate0Ebank0Eunits0Eto0Ecaixabank0Eof0Espain0C0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Bits Digital Diary: 0n 1nstagram’s Hyperlapse, and Fast-Forwarding to the Future

Most days, my Instagram feed is full of artfully arranged plates of food, dreamy vacation photos, gurgling babies and, of course, plenty of selfies.

But that changed earlier this week when Instagram introduced a new video editing app, called Hyperlapse, which allowed users to create "high-quality time-lapse videos" and import them into the photo and video sharing service.

Suddenly, my feed was full of video hyperdrive, sped-up videos of life in fast-forward.

It was a noticeable — and exciting — shift away from treating Instagram like a yearbook of our most memorable moments, perfectly frozen in time. Instead, people seemed to be exploring the passage of time and what it means to be alive in a particular moment, rather than just try to capture it and put a filter on it.

It's an exciting addendum to a service that has quickly become one of the most important social networks used by hundreds of millions of people. Time, like camera filters, provides a new prism through which people view and present themselves to the world.

Casey Cep, writing for Pacific Standard, an online publication, wondered if the future of photography would be in examining how the world around us changes, rather than imagining ourselves at the center of it.

If front-facing cameras gave birth to the selfie, what will time-lapse tools do to the version of ourselves and our lives that we document and share with other people?

Ms. Cep thinks that "our documentarian impulses will have to focus on objects and others rather than ourselves."

"You'll be able to watch your block or street change over a few weeks or a shoreline erode across years," she wrote.

The first few hyperlapse videos I came across gave me headaches, but that's not necessarily an indication of how the feature will evolve as people become more familiar with the medium. Already, it is broadening the way Instagram is used, like a 15-second tour tour of the White House and previews of magazine issues.

Time lapse is already fairly prevalent around the web, as in this popular and amazing six-second video on Vine, documenting a woman throughout her pregnancy.

But Hyperlapse helps nudge it into the mainstream. There could be another nudge from Apple, which is widely expected to include a time-lapse feature in the next version of its mobile software. At the very least, it will push social media users to consider what they choose to document, why and how, which is never a bad thing.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3dff9b19/sc/4/l/0Lbits0Bblogs0Bnytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C290Con0Einstagrams0Ehyperlapse0Eand0Efast0Eforwarding0Eto0Ethe0Efuture0C0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Jumat, 29 Agustus 2014

Chief Executive of Rovio, Maker of Angry Birds Game, to Step Down

Mikael Hed is stepping down after the company failed to respond to recent trends in gaming. By MARK SCOTT August 29, 2014

LONDON — The chief Angry Bird is leaving the nest.

Rovio, the Finnish gaming company behind the popular Angry Birds franchise, said on Friday that its chief executive, Mikael Hed, would step down by the end of the year as the company struggles financially.

Rovio has struggled recently after quickly rising to prominence in 2009 when Angry Birds became a global phenomenon. The company has failed to respond to more recent trends in gaming, and the announcement highlighted once again the precarious situation of many mobile gaming companies, whose fortunes often rely on a single franchise or technology.

Gaming companies are often dependent on a sole blockbuster franchise like Clash of Clans, a game produced by the Finnish company Supercell. Others, including Zynga, also have faced difficulties in reducing their reliance on social networks like Facebook, which were instrumental in promoting the games when they were first introduced.

Angry Birds was one of the first games to become a global phenomenon in 2009, but has lost its popularity.

But people's online habits change quickly — and franchises like Angry Birds can lose their popularity as quickly as they gained it. Analysts question whether Rovio and its rivals have the staying power to meet people's fast-changing interests. And creating a second big hit has often proved elusive.

"Most of these companies have been unable to replicate their past successes," said Paul Jackson, a gaming analyst at the research technology company Ovum in London. "Mobile games are very transient. There's no guarantee that people will play new games when they're released."

Mr. Hed co-founded Rovio with his cousin Niklas Hed in 2003. The company is majority-owned by Mikael Hed's father, Kaj Hed, who remains chairman of the company, which is private.

Mr. Hed will be replaced as Rovio chief executive by Pekka Rantala, who is not a member of the family. Mr. Rantala, the company's chief commercial officer, previously spent 14 years working at the Finnish telecommunications giant Nokia.

Mr. Hed has been nominated to the company's board, and will also become chairman of the company's animation and movie business, which the company has expanded into in the last few years.

"It has been an amazing ride," said Mr. Hed, who has typically worn a bright red Angry Birds hoodie during his public appearances. "In the coming months, I will be very happy to pass the hoodie to Pekka Rantala, who will take Rovio to the next level."

Angry Birds was one of the first games made for smartphones and tablets to take off in a major way, as millions of people paid $1 to download onto their mobile devices. The various versions of the game and its characters — including plump colorful birds that knock over structures — became a cultural symbol from San Francisco to Shanghai.

But while Angry Birds expanded into all sorts of merchandise and other entertainment forms, including apparel and movies, other game makers started to find financial riches in a different way.

Companies like King Digital Entertainment, the maker of the Candy Crush franchise, discovered millions of players and financial success with so-called freemium games, which let users play free but require the purchase of upgrades to gain access to premium content.

Rovio is a relative newcomer to freemium, introducing its first freemium game last year. The company said this year that its net profit for 2013 fell by more than 50 percent, to $37 million, compared with the previous year.

The company introduced its freemium game, Angry Birds Go, last year, but has diversified into movies, animation and theme parks to reduce its reliance on online gaming.

And in contrast to rivals, which typically charge players less than $3 for in-game purchases, Angry Bird's first freemium offering included upgrades that cost as much as $60 each to allow online characters to get to later stages of the game.

In a sign of how much Rovio has changed since the original Angry Birds game was released, the company now generates nearly half its revenue from licensing the Angry Birds brand for consumer products like candy dispensers and lunchboxes, according to the company's latest annual financial report.

Cracks also are starting to show in other mobile gaming companies, many of which have been valued at billions of dollars through lucrative initial public offerings. Investors worry that mobile gaming companies may not be built to sustain momentum once one of their games becomes a major hit because of the fleeting nature of the public's preferences.

Some gamers and regulators also are starting to question whether companies are misleading customers by not adequately disclosing the cost of the extras, while other consumers are walking away from existing mobile games in search for new titles.

"It's very difficult to attract users when they're always on the lookout for the next big thing," said Brian Blau, a gaming analyst at the technology research company Gartner. "There's always a bit of luck involved in making games."

Zynga, whose share price has fallen more than 70 percent since its initial public offering in December 2011, reported a $62.5 million loss in the second quarter, compared with a $15.8 million loss in the same period last year.The company has closed gaming studios and stopped development on weaker games to concentrate on fewer offerings. It also has signed licensing deals to diversify away from its FarmVille franchise into mobile sports games.

"These games are insanely profitably when they're successful," Mr. Jackson of Ovum said. "But people quickly get sick of games, and it's almost impossible to predict if a new game will be successful."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df7ffe7/sc/30/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C30A0Ctechnology0Cmikael0Ehed0Echief0Eexecutive0Eof0Eangry0Ebirds0Emaker0Eto0Estep0Edown0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Vice Media Stakes Future 0n A&E Networks Deal

By JONATHAN MAHLER August 29, 2014

After spending the summer flirting with various suitors, Vice Media said on Friday that it was close to choosing a partner: A&E Networks.

A&E, which is owned by Hearst and Disney, is near a deal to invest $250 million in Vice in exchange for a roughly 10 percent stake in the company. It would value Vice — which started 20 years ago as a free magazine in Montreal — at more than $2.5 billion.

Known for its unruly sensibility and news reports, Vice has established a powerful digital presence through its YouTube channels and websites.

The sizable investment from A&E underscores its success in creating a brand that appeals to a new generation of consumers — in particular young men — who have proved to be an elusive demographic for mainstream media companies.

Shane Smith is the chief executive of Vice Media.

"We've been looking pretty much everywhere for different partners," said Shane Smith, Vice's chief executive, in an interview. "The biggest thing we were looking for was complete independence. Everybody wanted a majority stake or a big stake. We didn't want to give up a big stake."

In some ways, Vice, with its tattooed news correspondents and hand-held cameras, is a logical fit for A&E, which broadcasts a number of offbeat shows. They include "Duck Dynasty," "Ice Road Truckers," "Swamp People" and "Pawn Stars," which focuses on Las Vegas pawnshop owners.

Most recently, Vice made news — and attracted millions of viewers — with a documentary series about the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. One of its correspondents got unusual access to ISIS, embedding with the extremist group.

Such programming has helped bolster Vice's image as an insurgent news organization, though much of its business involves making videos paid for by large corporations.

The A&E investment, which was first reported by The Financial Times, could make it less dependent on companies like Intel and AT&T and allow it to create more of its own original content. In particular, Mr. Smith has set his sights on traditional television. His company already produces a 30-minute weekly program for HBO — "News from the edge," is the tagline — but he'd like to eventually have a 24-hour Vice network.

Partnering with A&E will give Vice access to an array of television outlets for its programming. A&E operates a number of cable networks, including A&E, Lifetime and the History Channel. Down the road, A&E could potentially provide Vice with its own cable channel.

The investment will also give Vice an infusion of cash to develop shows for mobile, the web and traditional TV, to move content between those platforms, and to acquire new media assets. "It's a war chest," Mr. Smith said.

A&E is not the first traditional media company to make a big investment in Vice. Last year, the company sold a 5 percent stake to 21st Century Fox for $70 million.

In recent months, others had also engaged in serious talks with Vice, which is based in a converted warehouse in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Most prominently, Time Warner discussed buying a stake as large as 40 percent in the company, a deal that could have given Vice access to the cable channel HLN.

But the negotiations stalled when the two companies were unable to agree on how much control Vice would have over HLN and, most significantly, how much money Vice was worth. Time Warner put the company's value at a little more than $1.5 billion; Vice insisted that its valuation was closer to $2.5 billion.

A&E has apparently agreed. Though an enormous leap from where Vice was valued just last year, $2.5 billion remains just a drop in the bucket compared with what some companies in Silicon Valley have been fetching lately.

Snapchat, which creates a popular disappearing-message app, is in talks to raise money at a $10 billion valuation. And Pinterest, a growing picture-based social network, raised $200 million in May from investors who valued the service at $5 billion.

By comparison, Vice hardly qualifies as a start-up. Over the years, it has attracted a variety of prominent backers. Tom Freston, a founder and former chief of MTV who went on to run Viacom, is one of Vice's investors and closest advisers.

It is unclear what the A&E deal will mean for Vice's HBO show. It broadcast the final episode of its second season earlier this year. In last year's finale, Vice caused a stir when it took the basketball player Dennis Rodman and members of the Harlem Globetrotters to play in North Korea before Kim Jong-un, its leader. Vice has already committed to a third and fourth season.

For A&E's backers, Hearst and Disney, the Vice deal represents the latest foray into the booming digital media business. Disney recently acquired the YouTube video production network Maker Studios, and held talks with the website BuzzFeed, though a deal never materialized. Hearst, best known for its portfolio of magazines, has taken stakes in Buzzfeed and the fashion and style website Refinery 29.

Michael J. de la Merced contributed reporting.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3dfb6dce/sc/24/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C30A0Cbusiness0Cmedia0Ctime0Ewarner0Eends0Enegotiations0Eto0Ebuy0Estake0Ein0Evice0Emedia0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Business Briefing: Hershey Designs Chocolate Kiss 1nto 1ts New Logo

Business Briefing By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS August 29, 2014

The Hershey Company, the candy maker, is introducing a new corporate logo featuring a stylized version of one of its most famous chocolate products. The company on Friday announced the new design, which adds a chocolate Kiss at the end of the company's name. The logo is part of what the company calls a "disciplined identity system." Ronald Burrage, the company's senior global design director, said the goal was to help people "clearly identify, this is from the Hershey Company." For its products, the only change will be on the back of packaging where the company's name is printed. Hershey has about 13,000 employees and generates more than $7 billion in annual sales.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3dfb27e6/sc/4/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C30A0Cbusiness0Chershey0Edesigns0Echocolate0Ekiss0Einto0Eits0Enew0Elogo0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Your Money: Affixing More Value to the 0rdinary Experiences of Life

August 29, 2014

Your Money

By RON LIEBER

Last month, I spent a day in a library for the first time in over 20 years. I was there to work, but I appeared to be the only one doing so. Everyone else lolled about as the rain fell outside, helping themselves to the endless shelves of newspapers and magazines or browsing the newest fiction.

My work brings me joy. But as I looked around at the older patrons especially, I was overcome by a single emotion: jealousy. It had been too long since I'd sampled the simple but profound pleasure of losing myself in the stacks. I wanted to feel it again.

That craving stayed with me, and it helped me recognize how important some research from the June issue of The Journal of Consumer Research could be for helping many Americans find peace of mind as they contemplate their retirement savings. The lead article reported that older people often draw as much happiness from ordinary experiences — like a day in the library — as they do from extraordinary ones.

For people who have not saved enough or have broken into their savings because of lost jobs and health crises, the findings offer a glimmer of hope. If you can cover basic expenses, pursuing inexpensive, everyday things that bring comfort and satisfaction can lead to happiness equal to jetting about on international trips in your 70s and 80s.

The study's authors, Amit Bhattacharjee and Cassie Mogilner, met when Mr. Bhattacharjee was earning his doctorate at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, where Ms. Mogilner is an assistant professor of marketing. When they decided to work together, they did not set out to make grand pronouncements about aging.

Instead, they were trying to help answer one of the next big questions in the emerging field of happiness studies. Already, scholars in the field have established that experiences tend to make people happier than possessions. What we do, it seems, has more potential for lasting satisfaction and memory-making than what we have. But Mr. Bhattacharjee, who is now a visiting assistant professor of marketing at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, and Ms. Mogilner wanted to know what sort of experiences made people the most happy and why.

To find out, they conducted eight studies in which they asked participants about their recollections of, planning for or daydreaming about various happiness-making experiences. They also checked to see what sort of things their subjects were posting about on Facebook. The researchers' definitions of ordinary and extraordinary experiences, when they prompted people to discuss one or the other, were simple and focused on frequency; ordinary experiences happen often and occur in the course of everyday life while extraordinary ones are much more rare.

Extraordinary experiences bring great joy throughout life. No surprise there. But what the pair found again and again was that the older people got, the more happiness ordinary experiences delivered. In fact, the happiness-making potential of everyday pursuits eventually grows equal to that of ones that are rarer.

For Mr. Bhattacharjee, 32, the findings helped clarify a few things about his own parents. He had been attracted to research on moral beliefs and well-being in part because of his upbringing in a Bengali-speaking household of Indian immigrants. "My whole life, I felt like I was trying to sort out these competing cultural standards," he said. "What is good? What is desirable? There are very different sorts of standards that people apply."

When his younger brother started college, the two siblings plied their empty-nester parents with restaurant gift cards and theater tickets so they could revel in their freedom from full-time parenting duties. "They just had zero interest," he recalled. "They really relish the ordinary. At some point, I stopped fighting it. And once I started working on this stuff, it helped crystallize for me that their conception of what is valuable is different."

Different from what a young person might have expected, at least. His parents were never much for the grand journey or the statement vehicle. "I tell people I've been buying a new Mercedes and driving it off a cliff each year for 10 or 15 years," said Mr. Bhattacharjee's father, Arun, of his and his wife's efforts to pay for their sons' higher education.

Now that Arun Bhattacharjee, 73, is more than half a decade into retirement, he devotes his days to reading the newspaper and books and regular strolls near the family home in Audubon, Pa. "I walk in the neighborhood around the block a few times," he said. "Everybody knows me. Rain or shine."

His wife, Ratna, 63, still works as an engineer. She and Arun go to India about once a year to see her mother. The family of four did head to Las Vegas for a vacation recently. "I have not lost interest in those kinds of things," Arun Bhattacharjee said. "But I don't need that sort of thing all of the time to give me pleasure. I can get it from simple things."

Why might that be? Mr. Bhattacharjee and Ms. Mogilner explored some of the factors besides frequency that separate ordinary and extraordinary experiences and seized on one in particular: the tendency for extraordinary experiences to be self-defining in some way.

One way to think about this is to consider the various adventures younger people pursue to find themselves. "That sort of exploration to see what fits and feels like you may be the process by which you can start to figure out what sort of ordinary life to build," Mr. Bhattacharjee said.

Once you know yourself, the deliberate pursuit of more ordinary things can then deliver that same level of happiness. It doesn't hurt, either, that you may appreciate the ordinary much more once you're more aware of the decreasing number of years you have left to enjoy it.

Older people are not set in their ways, nor should they want to be, and it would be a mistake to think we know ourselves well enough to be certain of what will give us the most satisfaction when we're older. Retirement is just the sort of transition point that causes many people to seek new adventures and try on new ways of being in the world. No one should deny themselves that if they can afford it.

But plenty of people won't have the money to go to faraway places or pay to jump out of airplanes. Low-cost extraordinary experiences may well be nearby, but there ought to be much comfort in the evidence that everyday things that cost little or nothing can deliver the same amount of joy. A garden. The elaborate meal that emerges from it and the spare time to invent the recipes. A return to a neglected musical instrument. All-you-can-consume subscriptions to Netflix and Spotify, with watchlists and playlists that stretch on for years.

As for me, I'm merely middle-aged. But I'm almost positive that the first thing on my retirement wish list will be a brand-new library card.

Twitter: @ronlieber

Make the most of your money. Every Monday get articles about retirement, saving for college, investing, new online financial services and much more. Sign up for the Your Money newsletter here.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df9be61/sc/36/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C30A0Cyour0Emoney0Caffixing0Emore0Evalue0Eto0Ethe0Eordinary0Eexperiences0Eof0Elife0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Malaysia Airlines to Cut 30% of Work Force

By THOMAS FULLER and NICOLA CLARK August 29, 2014

BANGKOK — Malaysia Airlines will cut 6,000 jobs, or about 30 percent of its work force, and receive a bailout from the Malaysian government amounting to nearly $2 billion, according to a restructuring plan announced on Friday.

Several years of losses at the airline deepened this year after two aircraft disasters — the still unresolved disappearance of Flight 370 over the southern Indian Ocean in March, and the downing of Flight 17 over eastern Ukraine in July.

Azman Mokhtar, the managing director of Khazanah Nasional, the investment arm of the Malaysian government that has a majority stake in the airline, said future injections of state funds of up to 6 billion ringgit, or $1.9 billion, in the airline would come with "strict conditions."

"Success is by no means guaranteed," he said in statement released by the company.

The cash injection is the latest in a long series of bailouts for Malaysia's state-controlled enterprises.

Khazanah said there would be "significant changes to leadership" at Malaysia Airlines and that it would consider "global aviation industry executives" in its search for new talent. The current chief executive, Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, will remain as chief executive until July 2015.

The government said it would carry out the restructuring by creating a new company and migrating into it the "right-sized work force and work practices and contracts." Malaysia Airlines has been burdened in recent years by contracts with politically connected suppliers.

The burden — and the risk — of the restructuring plan appears to fall heavily on the airline's creditors. They will be offered a swap of the airline's debts for shares of a new company, according to the plan. Among the airline's largest bondholders is the government employee pension fund known as Kumpulan Wang Persaraan, which according to Friday's announcement agreed to swap 750 million ringgit, or around $240 million, for ordinary shares.

The move is likely to be controversial because investors have long assumed that the debts of the state-controlled airline were guaranteed by the government.

The plan calls for the airline to move its headquarters to the Kuala Lumpur International Airport, about an hour outside the city, from Subang Jaya, a suburb a bit closer to Kuala Lumpur.

Malaysia Airlines had been on government life support long before being hit with the loss of two planes this year.

Saddled with more than $4 billion in debt and cumulative financial losses of about $1.7 billion since 2011, Malaysia Airlines has been increasingly squeezed in recent years by competition from nimbler, low-cost rivals in the region, including AirAsia, founded by the Malaysian billionaire Tony Fernandes. Budget carriers now represent almost 60 percent of the air travel market in Southeast Asia, according to the Center for Asia Pacific Aviation in Sydney, Australia.

The flood of new entrants into the Southeast Asian air travel market during the past decade has spurred heavy investment in new routes and new aircraft, a trend with which Malaysia Airlines had sought keep pace. Until the loss of Flight 370, the airline was on course to continue a rapid expansion of capacity in both its domestic and regional networks this year, after a record 29 percent annual increase in passenger traffic in 2013.

But although the explosion of travel options has been a boon for passengers, analysts say the pace of the industry's expansion has started to overtake passenger demand. Even the most efficient budget carriers are seeing the number of empty seats rise, which has put downward pressure on airfares.

On long-distance routes, Malaysia Airlines has also failed to remain competitive, particularly on services to Europe and the Middle East, where it faces the steady encroachment of full-service carriers from the Gulf.

While the airline has already abandoned several money-losing long-distance flights, including some services to North and South America, analysts predict Malaysia Airlines will need to pare back many of its 80 international destinations.

In the last decade, Malaysia Airlines has received more than $1 billion from its controlling shareholder, Khazanah, and undergone at least four previous restructurings.

But analysts say those efforts have fallen short of true reform, papering over thorny problems that include a large and ageing jet fleet, an over-extended route network, an ossified management culture and a bloated, heavily unionized work force of nearly 20,000 employees.

"Malaysia Airlines has had big structural problems" for years, said Shakeel Adam, the managing partner of Aviado Partners, a Frankfurt-based consultancy that specializes in airline restructurings and start-ups. In the past, he said, resistance to job cuts by Malaysia's unions has been one of the main barriers to improving productivity and lowering operating costs.

But the impact of this year's disasters has created a new sense of recognition among Malaysia Airlines staff that this stab at reform could be its last chance.

"Now there may be a renewed opportunity to work together, not to save every last job, but to ensure that the airline survives," Mr. Adam said.

He dismissed recent suggestions that the recent disasters had forever tainted the Malaysia Airlines brand in the eyes of the flying public.

"When I hear people talking about a rebranding already, it means they don't yet understand the nature of restructuring," He said. "It's not about changing colors and painting over the wounds."

Thomas Fuller reported from Bangkok, and Nicola Clark from Paris.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df6793e/sc/24/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C30A0Cbusiness0Cinternational0Cmalaysia0Eairlines0Eto0Ecut0E30A0Eof0Ework0Eforce0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Malaysia Airlines to Cut 6,000 Jobs

By REUTERS August 29, 2014

KUALA LUMPUR — Malaysia Airlines, the country's loss-making flag carrier, will cut 30 percent of its workforce as part of a sweeping restructuring that will cost 6 billion ringgit ($1.90 billion), majority investor Khazanah Nasional [KHAZA.UL] said.

The carrier will slash its staff by 6,000 to 14,000 as it takes steps to stem long-running losses worsened by two aircraft disasters this year, the state fund said in a statement on Friday.

Malaysia Airlines will be de-listed from the Kuala Lumpur exchange by the end of 2014, Khazanah said, adding that it aims to return the carrier to profitability within three years of the de-listing.

"Recent tragic events and ongoing difficulties at MAS have created a perfect storm that is allowing this restructuring to take place," Khazanah Managing Director Azman Mokhtar told reporters in Kuala Lumpur.

"We believe that the 6 billion is not a bailout, we believe it will be recovered with re-listing," he said.

Khazanah said in the statement that it plans to re-list the carrier in three to five years from now.

Ahmad Jauhari Yahya will stay on as chief executive until July next year, Khazanah said, adding that the search for a new CEO has begun.

STEMMING LOSSES

On Thursday, MAS said its second-quarter net loss widened to 307 million ringgit from 176 million a year earlier, though the result was an improvement from a net loss of 443 million ringgit in the first quarter.

MAS warned of poor second-half earnings as passenger bookings continue to fall, with business hit by the shooting down of Flight MH17 over Ukraine in July and the unexplained disappearance of Flight MH370 in March.

MAS has posted three straight years of losses in the face of competition from rising budget airlines like AirAsia Bhd.

Khazanah, which currently has a 69 percent stake in the carrier, has injected more than 5 billion ringgit into MAS over the last 10 years.

Khazanah said it plans to reduce the net gearing of the airline through debt-for-equity swaps.

It will also review all supply contracts while focusing on the carrier's regional flight network and improving revenue yields.

Malaysia Airlines will retain global flight connectivity through the Oneworld alliance and code-sharing, Khazanah said.

(1 US dollar = 3.1530 Malaysian ringgit)

(Reporting by Al-Zaquan Amer Hamzah; Editing by Stuart Grudgings and Ryan Woo)


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df56f5b/sc/24/l/0L0Snytimes0N0Creuters0C20A140C0A80C290Cbusiness0C29reuters0Emalaysia0Eairline0Erestructuring0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Kamis, 28 Agustus 2014

DealBook: Businesses Are Winning Cat-and-Mouse Tax Game

A pharmaceutical company moved its headquarters to Ireland, sharply reducing its tax rate. A billboard company reclassified itself as a real estate concern, meaning it will no longer pay corporate taxes. And a big oil producer split itself in two, cleaving off a multibillion-dollar division that now operates tax-free.

Across corporate America, companies large and small are finding new ways to address one of the business world's oldest irritations: paying taxes.

By exploiting existing loopholes and devising new ones, some of the country's best-known companies are making it harder than ever for the federal government to replenish its already depleted coffers.

As a result, business income tax revenue remains stagnant at about 2 percent of gross domestic product even as corporate profits hit records.

Business taxes now make up less than 10 percent of federal revenue, and in some years as little as 6.6 percent. That is sharply down from the years after World War II, when about 30 percent of federal revenue came from corporate taxes.

The decline is the result of the rise of untraditional business structures, the effects of a more globalized economy and a labyrinth of subsidies and tax credits. And though the erosion has happened gradually over decades, the surging popularity of inversions — acquisitions of overseas companies that allow American corporations to reincorporate abroad — is raising concerns that an already precarious situation is growing untenable.

"There's been a long, slow, steady decline," said William G. Gale, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and an economic adviser to President George H. W. Bush. "It's a confluence of a bunch of things, and it's increasingly difficult to figure out how to effectively tax corporations."

Lawmakers in Washington are calling for an overhaul of the corporate tax code. Upon becoming chairman of the Senate Finance Committee this year, Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, said it was time to revamp the "dysfunctional, rotting mess of a carcass that we call the tax code." But political gridlock makes the possibility of any quick action all but nonexistent.

While officials may not be in the mood to cooperate, they are taking notice of recent developments. Three tax-avoidance tactics in particular have grabbed the attention of lawmakers and the White House, though the root of the problem runs much deeper.

Photo Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat of Oregon, has called for an overhaul of the tax code.Credit Mike Theiler/Reuters

Most prominently, the number of inversions is at an all-time high, fueled by a rush of health care companies striking deals for overseas rivals.

AbbVie, which will become one of the 50 largest companies in the world through its $54 billion takeover of the Irish drug maker Shire, became the largest American company to strike an inversion. But more than a dozen other firms have made similar moves, most likely costing the government nearly $20 billion over the next 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Republicans and Democrats have called for legislation to end inversions, even in the absence of broader corporate tax reform. But the threat of new laws to curb them only seems to be quickening the pace.

"Wall Street is whispering in the ears of all these corporate executives saying, 'Congress might shut this down, you've got to do it now,' " said Rebecca J. Wilkins, senior counsel at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

Another corporate structure being exploited now more than ever is the master limited partnership. These partnerships are part of a broad class of companies known as pass-through entities because they pass all profits along to shareholders and are therefore exempt from paying corporate income taxes.

Dozens of these have been created in the last two years, reducing the Treasury's income by about $1.6 billion annually, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. Last year, the oil and gas company Phillips 66 spun out its pipeline assets into a master limited partnership, shielding millions of dollars in profits from taxation.

In response to the uptick in master limited partnerships, the Internal Revenue Service temporarily halted new approvals of the structure this year, and the Treasury Department said it was examining the effects on future tax revenue.

Another type of pass-through entity, the real estate investment trust, is also experiencing record popularity. Like master limited partnerships, real estate investment trusts pass profits along to investors, exempting them from corporate taxes.

But loose standards have allowed an ever wider variety of businesses to reclassify themselves as real estate investment trusts, broadening the universe of businesses avoiding taxes altogether. CBS Outdoor, the billboard company, relisted as a REIT this year.

And in a recent ruling, the I.R.S. allowed Windstream, a telecommunications firm, to spin off its underground cables and assorted real estate into a separate publicly traded company. Tax experts believe the ruling opens the door for a new wave of such transactions from a broad range of businesses.

Corporate advisers say that companies are pursuing these structures because, in the face of slow organic growth, executives are looking for additional profits wherever they can find them.

"It's self-help tax reform," said Kyle E. Pomerleau, an economist at the Tax Foundation. "If Congress is not willing to reform the corporate tax code, companies are going to do it for themselves."

Despite the outsize attention in Washington being paid to the tax-avoidance techniques, they represent only a small part of the reason corporate tax revenue has declined so precipitously.

"Inversions are the very small end of the tail," Mr. Gale said. "They just happen to be the part that's wagging right now."

The more fundamental issue is a series of systemic changes to the tax system and the shifting international tax landscape.

Over the years, a growing portion of the United States economy has shifted away from traditional corporations and into lower-taxed structures like partnerships and S-corporations, which are exempt from paying income taxes. This has put a growing swath of the economy beyond the reach of the I.R.S.

"It's gotten much easier to never put money into the corporate sector, or to move it around internationally once it is in the corporate sector," Mr. Gale said.

Only 6 percent of businesses are traditional corporations subject to the corporate income tax, according to the Congressional Research Service. That is down from 17 percent in 1980. The result is that less than half of the government's business income comes from corporations, down from about 80 percent in 1980.

And while most S-corporations are small to midsize businesses, as was intended, some of the country's largest private companies, including Bechtel, one of the country's largest engineering firms, are also organized as S-corporations to avoid corporate income taxes.

"A lot of the income that used to be earned at the corporate level is now being moved to the S-corp level," Mr. Pomerleau said.

And for those traditional corporations that are subject to the United States corporate tax rate, which at 35 percent is the highest in the world, there are myriad ways to avoid paying anything close to that. By taking advantage of a warren of credits, deductions and exemptions, corporations pay an average effective rate of just 12.6 percent, according to the Government Accountability Office.

Much of the tax avoidance comes as multinational corporations take advantage of overseas subsidiaries to shuffle money, intellectual property and assets into lower-taxed jurisdictions. In 2010, a majority of overseas profits reported by American firms were recorded in just 12 low-tax countries like the Netherlands, Bermuda, and Ireland, according to Citizens for Tax Justice.

That skewed distribution of profits is a result of the changed global tax landscape, where many countries have sharply lowered their corporate rates while the United States has not.

Those attractive overseas rates — and the fact that, unlike the United States, other countries do not tax international earnings — are among the reasons that companies are rushing to strike inversion deals.

"We cannot compete with zero," Ms. Wilkins said.

Republicans and Democrats in Congress and the White House all agree the country is overdue for comprehensive tax reform. The last big revision of the tax code came in 1986. Before that, the previous rewrite was in 1954. But ideas on how to proceed vary wildly, diminishing the likelihood of any rapid reforms.

"There's no primitive law of nature that every 30 years they will revise the tax code," Mr. Gale said. "I don't see much in terms of comprehensive tax reform happening with this Congress and this administration. It feels they're done talking to one another."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df3372c/sc/24/l/0Ldealbook0Bnytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Cbusinesses0Efind0Eways0Eto0Eavoid0Ecorporate0Etaxes0Ebut0Ea0Efix0Eseems0Eunlikely0C0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Business Briefing: Abercrombie & Fitch to Cut Logo 1tems After Sales Decline

Business Briefing By REUTERS August 28, 2014

Abercrombie & Fitch, after reporting its 10th straight decline in quarterly same-store sales, said it would reduce logo-focused apparel "to practically nothing" as it tries to remake its image with an expanded line, including larger sizes for women. Same-store sales declined 7 percent in the quarter that ended Aug. 2. Net sales decreased 6 percent to $890.6 million.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df350fd/sc/24/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C290Cbusiness0Cabercrombie0Efitch0Eto0Ecut0Elogo0Eitems0Eafter0Esales0Edecline0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Shell Submits a Plan for New Alaskan Arctic 0il Exploration

By CLIFFORD KRAUSS August 28, 2014

Royal Dutch Shell submitted a plan to the federal government on Thursday to try once again to explore for oil in the Alaskan Arctic, following years of legal and logistical setbacks as well as dogged opposition from environmentalists.

While the plan is just a first step in the process, it reflects the energy potential in the Arctic. Shell's proposed programs consist of two drilling rigs working simultaneously in the Chukchi Sea, which could produce more than 400,000 barrels of oil a day.

Shell emphasized that it had not made a final decision on whether to drill next summer. But it said that the filing with the Interior Department preserved its options.

The efforts, even in this preliminary stage, are likely to rankle environmentalists, who argue that drilling in the Arctic is overly risky because of ice floes, darkness in winter and the presence of several species of already threatened wildlife like polar bears. Several environmental groups were quick to say they would oppose Shell's latest plan, including with court challenges, if it receives government approval.

In 2012 a Shell drilling vessel was grounded in heavy seas off the coast of Alaska.

Over the last eight years, Shell's Alaskan Arctic efforts have been plagued by blunders and accidents involving ships and support equipment, reaching a climax with the grounding of one of its drilling vessels in late December 2012 in stormy seas. Environmental groups seized on the episodes as evidence to support their claims about the risks.

Shell, which has already spent about $6 billion on the effort, drilled two shallow wells in Alaska's Arctic during 2012. But the federal government did not allow Shell to reach the deeper, oil-bearing formations. The company did not have the equipment to contain spills after the testing failure of a containment dome designed to cap a runaway well and collect oil in case of an accident.

After Shell's problems, ConocoPhillips and the Norwegian oil giant Statoil suspended their Alaskan Arctic drilling plans.

Shell's plans for the Alaskan Arctic had looked doubtful since Ben van Beurden took over as the company's new chief executive nearly nine months ago. Mr. van Beurden pledged to increase discipline on rising costs and improve cash flow. Under his guidance, the company has begun to sell off underperforming natural gas and oil fields around the United States while stepping up production from its deep water Brazilian and Gulf of Mexico oil wells. Profit is improving, though Shell's investments in Russia could be at risk if Western sanctions tighten.

The company announced in January that it would not make an effort to drill in Alaska this summer, given the legal obstacles. A federal appeals court had ruled that the Interior Department's environmental impact review was flawed when it sold Shell over $2 billion in oil leases in the Chukchi Sea.

But in recent weeks, Shell has shown renewed interest in its Alaska efforts by signing an agreement with several Alaska Native corporations to share profits from offshore drilling. Wall Street analysts said Shell could not afford to watch other companies succeed elsewhere in the Russian and Canadian Arctic and not participate in the future drilling.

"These people are paid to play and not to watch," said Fadel Gheit, a senior oil company analyst at Oppenheimer & Company. "After all the hiccups and bad luck, the company has decided that the upside potential is greater than the downside risk and its worth another shot."

The Alaskan Arctic is one of the great untapped frontiers for offshore drilling in the United States, with the potential to produce up to a million barrels a day, according to industry experts. But Alaska has suffered a long decline in its oil production because of the aging of its onshore fields and underinvestment.

Gov. Sean Parnell pushed a tax overhaul supported by the oil industry through the Alaska Legislature last year, and this month beat back a ballot referendum effort intended to return the state to its old tax regime. With new tax breaks and incentives, the industry has pledged to invest more in Alaska's oil fields.

Still, Shell faces many hurdles in its renewed efforts. The Interior Department's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management must redo the original inadequate environmental impact assessment by the spring when Arctic waters begin to open and Shell can start to move its drilling and support vessels into position.

A coalition of environmental groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity and Earthjustice, are preparing to challenge a new assessment if reaches a similar conclusion to the previous one. A legal challenge, even if its ultimately unsuccessful, could mean more delays for drilling.

"Drilling in the Arctic makes no more sense in 2015 than it did when it was first proposed," said Brendan Cummings, senior counsel for the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental activist group.

Shell will also need to have its exploration plan approved by the Interior Department. A Shell spokesman, Curtis Smith, said that the new plan had fortified safety features, including new tugboats, an extra helicopter, additional offshore supply vessels and better management of contractors.

"All to say we've taken a critical look at the experiences we've had in Alaska over the last several years and this exploration plan takes those learnings into account," he added.

Environmentalists are similarly expected challenge any approval of those plans. Shell's separate spill response plan, submitted earlier, is also currently being contested in a federal appeals court based in San Francisco.

"Anyone who has been following this story knows Shell is not Arctic-ready," said Travis Nichols, a spokesman for Greenpeace, was highly critical of Shell's planning. "And more importantly, the Arctic will never be Shell-ready."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df1f453/sc/38/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C290Cbusiness0Cshell0Esubmits0Ea0Eplan0Efor0Enew0Ealaskan0Earctic0Eoil0Eexploration0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Supplier for Samsung and Lenovo Accused of Using Child Labor

By REUTERS August 28, 2014

China Labor Watch said it had found more than 10 children working at the factory of a China-based supplier for the technology giants Samsung Electronics and the Lenovo Group during an investigation in July and August. The group, based in New York, also said its investigation had found over 100 student workers who were not being paid overtime wages or a subsidy for working at night.

The supplier, HEG Technology, denied the allegations, and Samsung said it had found no children or students working on the Samsung production line at the factory, in Huizhou. A Lenovo spokeswoman said the company would look into the report.

In a statement, China Labor Watch said it had shared evidence with Samsung last week and that Samsung demanded that the supplier pay some students' wages. But it did not say whether Samsung took any action on the matter of child labor or whether it had reached out to Lenovo with the information.

In response, Samsung said it had proposed to China Labor Watch that they conduct a joint investigation "for more precise verification" of the allegations. Samsung also said it had informed the watchdog about its own investigation, adding: "We find it regrettable that CLW issued the allegations today without any mention of our statement."

HEG Technology said the company had never hired children, and that it had facial recognition systems in place to ensure workers were not underage.

This is the second time in as many months that China Labor Watch has said it found children working at Samsung's Chinese suppliers. Samsung halted business with one supplier and later reinstated it, but with a 30 percent reduction in orders.

Other multinational companies, including in industries like textiles and toys, have been plagued by revelations of underage workers in their supply chains. Child workers have been discovered at Foxconn, the supplier for some of the world's biggest tech brands, including Apple. Foxconn is the trading name of Taiwan's Hon Hai Precision Industry.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df22cab/sc/15/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C290Ctechnology0Csupplier0Efor0Esamsung0Eand0Elenovo0Eaccused0Eof0Eusing0Echild0Elabor0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Student-Built Apps Teach Colleges a Thing or Two

Vaibhav Verma created a computer program that helped students at Rutgers get into popular classes. By ARIEL KAMINER August 27, 2014

Vaibhav Verma was frustrated that he could not get into the most popular courses at Rutgers University, so he decided to try a new approach.

He didn't sleep outside classrooms to be first in line when the door opened, or send professors a solicitous note. Instead, he built a web-based application that could repeatedly query the New Jersey university's registration system. As soon as anyone dropped the class, Mr. Verma's tool would send him a message, and he would grab the open spot.

"I built it just because I was a little bit bored," he said.

By the next semester, 8,000 people had used it.

A student-made scheduling program at Rutgers was used by 8,000 people.

At Brown University, Jonah Kagan had a clever idea of his own: Get his fellow students to name their three favorite courses, and use the results as a guide for people seeking great, unusual electives. Building the website was easy, but he could not persuade Brown to give him enrollment figures, which would have allowed him to control for differences in class size. So the survey died.

Experiences like those two are becoming common at campuses around the country, as students are showing up the universities that trained them by producing faster, easier-to-navigate, more informative and generally just better versions of the information systems at the heart of undergraduate life.

Students now arriving for fall semester may find course catalogs that they can instantly sort and re-sort according to every imaginable search criteria. Scheduling programs that allow someone to find the 47 different classes that meet Thursdays at 8:30 p.m., then narrow them down to those that have no prerequisites, then narrow again to those that count toward requirements in two majors. Or apps that allow you to see what courses your friends are considering, or figure out who has the same free periods that you do, or plot the quickest route between two far-flung classrooms.

But this culture of innovation has accelerated debates about the flow of information on campus, and forced colleges to reckon with some unexpected results of the programming skills they are imparting.

Jonah Kagan's app at Brown was stymied by bureaucracy.

Last year 19 students at Baruch College in Manhattan used a computer script to check for openings in crowded courses — at such high frequency that they nearly took down not just Baruch's computer system but also that of the entire City University of New York. That earned them a stern talking-to. On the other hand, the scheduling app that two University of California, Berkeley, students devised worked so well that administrators decided to adapt it for official use.

These encounters have proved to be educational, though not always in the way the colleges intend.

"What I really learned," Mr. Kagan said of his negotiations with Brown, "is how hard it is to get the data you need out of these old legacy school information systems."

To some extent, the tension reflects a basic difference in worldview.

"Students are always more entrepreneurial and understand needs better than bureaucracies can," said Harry R. Lewis, the director of undergraduate studies for Harvard's computer science department, "since bureaucracies tend to have messages they want to spin, and priorities they have to set, and students just want stuff that is useful. I know this well, since students were talking to me about moving the Harvard face books online seven years before Zuckerberg just went and did it without asking permission."

Zach Hall saw that up close when, as a student at Furman University, he developed a course-selection website that included a wide array of useful functions. "Classget.com beat the socks off the course listings that the university was putting out there," recalled Brad Barron, the registrar at the South Carolina institution. But, worried that it might harm the university's computer system, Mr. Hall recalled, "the I.T. department kind of freaked out."

Eventually, however, they proposed a compromise: Internet technology officials would make it easier for him to get the data he required if he would remove the links to rate-your-professor sites (which never go over well with the professors being rated). He took the deal.

To help their fellow student-developers, 10 students and newly graduated seniors from colleges around the country converged on a lodge at Lake Tahoe last summer for what they called a Campus Data Summit. They have since published a guidebook for dealing with recalcitrant university administrations, including advice like "be proactive about their fears," "make friends with faculty" and, perhaps most crucially, ask for "forgiveness, not permission."

Amy Quispe, a summit-meeting organizer who was finishing her studies at Carnegie Mellon University, said struggles over campus data were so bad in some cases that "in a lot of ways students' creativity was being stifled."

Campus software developers say they see evidence that some colleges are becoming more comfortable with these collaborations, though as with any learning process, the path is not always a straight one.

Alex Sydell and William Li collaborated on a website, Ninja Courses, that made it easy for fellow students at Berkeley, and later at four more U.C. campuses, to compare every aspect of different courses as they built their schedule for the semester. Berkeley saw the website's value and went so far as to pay them for their innovation. ("For students, the offer they gave us was very generous," is all Mr. Li will say about the amount.)

But when their point person moved onto another job, Mr. Sydell says, they got a cease-and-desist letter accusing them, among other things, of violating U.C. copyrights by using the colleges' names.

Those concerns appear to have been assuaged; Ninja Courses now has over 50,000 registered users.

Yale University, which initially shut down a website that the twin brothers Harry Yu and Peter Xu built to make the course catalog easier to navigate, later admitted that it did not really understand the processes it was trying to regulate. "Questions of who owns data are evolving before our very eyes," Mary Miller, the dean of Yale College, said at the time. "What we now see is that we need to review our policies and practices."

Some universities are bringing student software developers directly into the fold. Stanford administrators liked Kevin Conley's idea for an app with information about the campus bus service, so they gave him a job building it. It is now available free at the iTunes app store.

At Brown, where Mr. Kagan had trouble getting enrollment figures, Ravi Pendse, the university's new chief information officer, said that when it came to sharing data, schools "tend to be risk averse, and with good reason" — starting with laws that require them to protect students' privacy. "The easiest answer is to say no."

He has taken a different approach, however, starting what he calls "a student software hub for collaboration and innovation," designed to support students with ideas about how to connect campus information systems. "I wish Jonah Kagan would come back, and we'll work with him," he said.

Many campus developers say the next frontier is for more colleges to get comfortable releasing their information not case by case, but in uniform formats known as A.P.I.s (for application programming interfaces). That would make it possible, they say, to create tools that work at Florida State University as well as they do at Alaska Bible College. Students at disparate schools could spend time building on one another's efforts instead of just replicating them.

"It turns out if you give students that power they'll do some pretty great things with it." said Alexey Komissarouk, who started a student group called PennApps while at the University of Pennsylvania.

It has done some pretty great things for the students, too. Ms. Quispe now works at Google. Mr. Kagan works at Clever, an educational start-up that assembles student data from K-12 schools around the country. Mr. Li is still running Ninja Courses. And Mr. Sydell works at DropBox. He said he could not be sure how much Ninja Courses helped him get the job, but added, "I'd guess that it scored some bonus points."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3def128d/sc/4/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Cnyregion0Cstudents0Einventing0Eprograms0Eto0Estreamline0Etheir0Ecolleges0Edata0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

DealBook: Resurgence in 0il and Gas Sector Spurs Merger Boom

Photo Operations in the Bakken shale formation could be ripe for acquisitions, analysts say.Credit Andrew Burton/Getty Images

The merger boom in the energy sector shows no signs of slowing.

As energy production in the United States rises substantially, pipeline and storage companies will look to expand capacity through acquisitions, industry analysts and investors forecast.

"Companies are lining up to take advantage of this production-growth story," said Quinn Kiley, a manager of energy infrastructure investment portfolios for Advisory Research Inc. "Companies have huge opportunity sets in front of them."

Figures from the federal Energy Information Administration highlight the extent of the growth. United States energy production has reversed decades of stagnant or falling output in recent years. Oil production has gained 49 percent and natural gas output has increased 28.5 percent, from their lows in the mid-2000s through 2013. Reserves that are economically viable to recover are up sharply, too, the agency's website says, providing energy companies a greater incentive to invest.

"As technology gets better, it makes production from some formations profitable and predictable and productive over a long period of time," Mr. Kiley said. "That leads to a changing dynamic for companies that transport and store this supply."

Merger activity has been strong this year in the energy sector in the United States, according to data from Thomson Reuters. About $123 billion in energy mergers were announced from January through July, up 47 percent from the period a year earlier, the data showed.

Many of the businesses involved in deals are energy infrastructure businesses, which tend to be set up as master limited partnerships, or M.L.P.s. These are tax-favored vehicles that in the early part of their lives are encouraged to expand as rapidly as possible for complicated reasons related to how they distribute income from their operations.

"You can't be an M.L.P. without being a bit of a deal junkie," said Deborah Byers, managing partner at Ernst & Young in Houston. "You have to grow your base constantly to pay the distribution."

M.L.P.s are likely to keep merging, even though a pioneer of the structure, Kinder Morgan, is abandoning it. Other potential buyers are expansion-minded pipeline companies, said Todd L. Williams, an energy analyst at Westwood Management. Even Kinder Morgan, the industry leader, with 80,000 miles of pipelines, has "holes in its asset footprint," he noted, particularly in the Marcellus shale formation in the Northeast and the Bakken deposits in Montana, North Dakota and adjoining parts of Canada.

Possible takeover targets that are pipeline operators for Kinder Morgan include Oneok Partners in the Bakken field and MarkWest Energy Partners and Williams Inc. in the Marcellus, he said. They are the right size in the right places, in his view.

"Kinder Morgan needs chunky acquisitions" worth above $5 billion each to have a meaningful effect on growth, Mr. Williams said. The entities he mentioned had market values of $13.5 billion to $44.2 billion as of Wednesday.

Mr. Kiley agreed that Kinder Morgan could pursue MarkWest. But he sees Williams, which has extensive assets throughout the country, as so big that a bid would run afoul of regulators.

A business that Mr. Kiley finds ripe for a Kinder Morgan-style consolidation is Energy Transfer Equity, an M.L.P. that controls four others involved in various activities. It recently announced plans to buy Susser Petroleum Partners, which operates gasoline stations, he noted.

It also may create a conventional corporation to hold some of its own equity and then have an initial public offering, he said, to attract investors for whom an M.L.P.'s tax breaks are wasted, such as holders of tax-free retirement accounts.

Ms. Byers of Ernst & Young considers the outlook for deals so extensive that certain companies could be either buyers or targets, including Anadarko Petroleum and Marathon Petroleum. Large foreign energy conglomerates, like Cnooc in China and Total in France, are also possible bidders, she said, adding that if foreign buyers are enticed into the market, they will have plenty of company.

"Everybody, whether big integrated players or independent upstream and midstream players, is making significant strategic bets," she said, referring to production and transportation companies. "I've been in this business 27 years, and I've never seen as many alternative paths as companies seem to take today."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3df05b4d/sc/24/l/0Ldealbook0Bnytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Cresurgence0Ein0Eoil0Eand0Egas0Esector0Espurs0Emerger0Eboom0C0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Second-Quarter G.D.P. Growth Revised Up to 4.2%

By REUTERS August 28, 2014

WASHINGTON — The U.S. economy rebounded more strongly than initially thought in the second quarter and details of a report on Thursday pointed to sustainable underlying strength.

Gross domestic product expanded at a 4.2 percent annual rate instead of the previously reported 4.0 percent pace, the Commerce Department said, reflecting upward revisions to business spending and exports.

It was the fastest pace since the third quarter of 2013.

The composition of growth in the second quarter was even more encouraging, with the sources of growth broad-based.

Domestic demand increased at a 3.1 percent rate, instead of the previously reported 2.8 percent pace. It was the fastest pace since the second quarter of 2010 and suggested the recovery was more durable after output slumped in the first quarter because of an unusually cold winter.

Economists polled by Reuters had expected the second-quarter GDP growth pace would be revised down to 3.9 percent. The economy contracted at a 2.1 percent pace in the first quarter.

Gross domestic income, which measures the income side of the growth ledger, surged at a 4.7 percent rate, consistent with strong job gains during the quarter. That was the largest increase since the first quarter of 2012.

This alternative growth measure decreased at a 0.8 percent pace in the first quarter.

Corporate profits rebounded from a decline that had been spurred by the expiration of a depreciation bonus.

Growth in consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity, was unrevised at a 2.5 percent rate.

Businesses accumulated $83.9 billion worth of inventory in the second quarter, less than the initially reported $93.4 billion. That saw restocking contributing 1.39 percentage points to GDP growth rather than 1.66 percentage points.

The relatively smaller inventory build means less stock overhang, which bodes well for third-quarter GDP growth.

While trade was a drag for a second consecutive quarter, export growth was raised to a 10.1 percent pace from a 9.5 percent rate. Business spending on equipment and nonresidential structures, such as gas drilling, was revised higher.

Housing market-related spending was revised slightly down as was government spending.

(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Andrea Ricci)


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3def7349/sc/30/l/0L0Snytimes0N0Creuters0C20A140C0A80C280Cbusiness0C28reuters0Eusa0Eeconomy0Egrowth0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

DealBook: Telefónica and Telecom 1talia Competing for Vivendi’s Brazilian Business

LONDON – A bidding war has broken out for Vivendi's telecommunications operations in Brazil as rivals Telefónica of Spain and Telecom Italia made competing offers for the business on Thursday.

Earlier this month, Telefónica offered to pay about $8.9 billion in cash and shares for Global Village Telecom with an eye toward combining it with its mobile and broadband operations in Brazil, which operate under the Vivo brand.

On Thursday, Telefónica sweetened its bid to about $9.8 billion after Telecom Italia, one of its main rivals in Brazil, offered to pay a combination of cash and shares that valued the business at 7 billion euros, or about $9.2 billion.

Telecom Italia wants to combine G.V.T. with TIM Participações, which it controls.

Vivendi's board will examine both offers later Thursday. Telefónica's sweetened offer expires on Friday.

The offers by Telefónica and Telecom Italia come a day after the Brazilian telecom provider Oi said that it had hired the investment bank Banco BTG Pactual to explore alternatives to acquire Telecom Italia's controlling stake in TMI.

"Oi will keep its shareholders and the market informed of any material events," the company said in a regulatory filing on Wednesday.

A deal for G.V.T. would be the latest in a wave of consolidation as Telefónica and other European carriers swap assets in hopes of attracting more customer dollars by offering bundled mobile, land-line, broadband and television services.

In July, European antitrust regulators signed off on Telefónica's long-awaited acquisition of Germany's smallest mobile operator, E-Plus.

That deal, worth €8.6 billion, would combine the third- and fourth-largest cellphone providers in Germany and create a rival on par with T-Mobile and Vodafone, which together control more than half of the mobile phone market in Germany.

As part of its sweetened proposal, Telefónica would pay €4.66 billion in cash and give Vivendi a 12 percent stake in its Brazilian operations. About one-third of those shares could be exchanged at Vivendi's discretion for 5.7 percent of the share capital and 8.3 percent of the voting rights of Telecom Italia.

Telefónica, based in Madrid, recently announced plans to sell convertible bonds in Telecom Italia worth about 750 million euros, or $1 billion, to reduce its stake in the Italian company and appease Brazilian competition regulators.

For its part, Telecom Italia has offered to pay €1.7 billion in cash and to give Vivendi a 15 percent stake in its Brazilian operations and a stake worth 16 percent of the share capital and 21.7 percent of the voting rights of the Italian company.

Telecom Italia would hold about 60 percent of the combined TIM and G.V.T. post merger. Its offer expires in September and would require shareholder approval.

Brazil is an important market for both companies.

Telefónica's Brazilian operations are a main driver of its business in Latin America, accounting for 42 percent of its revenue in the region last year. The company's Brazilian business posted revenue of €12.2 billion in 2013.

As of the end of June, Telefónica had about 95 million customer access accounts in Brazil, primarily driven by mobile customers.

Telecom Italia's Brazilian operations have more than 73.4 million customers and annual revenue of about €7 billion, the company said.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3ded2bfc/sc/46/l/0Ldealbook0Bnytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Ctelefnica0Eand0Etelecom0Eitalia0Ecompeting0Efor0Evivendis0Ebrazilian0Ebusiness0C0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Rabu, 27 Agustus 2014

Workers Win Supermarket President’s Job Back

By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE and MICHAEL J. de la MERCED August 27, 2014

After the intervention of two governors and an enormous public outcry, the chaos that has paralyzed the Market Basket supermarket chain ended Wednesday night with a deal between the two warring factions of the Demoulas family, the company said in a statement.

The deal approved by the chain's board essentially meets the sole demand of the workers who have been staging huge public rallies for six weeks: that Arthur T. Demoulas, who was president until June, be reinstated to lead the company.

His cousin, Arthur S. Demoulas, and his allies agreed to sell their 50.5 percent stake in the company to Arthur T. Demoulas and his allies, who own 49.5 percent, according to the statement.

The price was more than $1.6 billion, which puts the value of the chain at about $3.2 billion, according to a person with knowledge of the agreement, who was not authorized to speak about the terms of the transaction. That valuation may seem high given that the business has ground to a halt, but it reflects optimism that the employees can rebuild it.

As part of the deal, Arthur T. Demoulas will return immediately "with day-to-day operational authority," according to the statement. But he will not technically become chief executive until the deal is finalized over the next several months.

The current co-chief executives, Felicia Thornton and James Gooch, who were installed by Arthur S. Demoulas, will "remain in place" until the deal closes, the announcement said.

It was the firing of Arthur T. Demoulas and the installation of Ms. Thornton and Mr. Gooch that touched off protests by employees in mid-July. The deal includes a set of penalties and incentives intended to get Arthur T. Demoulas to finalize the transaction by the end of February.

The settlement would end one of the strangest labor actions in American business history, one that disrupted a low-price grocery chain that attracted two million shoppers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Maine. And perhaps most surprising, it ends with the sole demand of the workers, from top management to the lowliest clerks, being met.

"This show of group solidarity achieved what the employees and customers asked for," said Christopher Mackin, a lecturer at Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations. "This is unheard-of in corporate America. It's like 1776 — we get to pick who governs us."

The protests left store shelves bare. Shoppers, in solidarity with employees, boycotted the chain. The company started losing millions of dollars a week, and analysts questioned whether it could be salvaged.

Arthur T. Demoulas, who long presented himself as an ally to workers, was elevated to cult status as employees carried posters with his picture, calling him "our one true leader" and demanding his reinstatement.

As employees and customers held ever bigger and more boisterous rallies, in the boardroom the family factions appeared stuck. As the stalemate continued, Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts and Gov. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire waded into the fight. Although Market Basket is a private company, they said a successful resolution was overwhelmingly in the public interest.

The buyout process was supervised by the three independent directors — Keith Cowan, Eric Gebaide and Ron Weiner — of Market Basket's seven-member board. Among the biggest issues was what role Arthur T. Demoulas would play after the announcement of a deal and before the actual closing, with a so-called interim operating agreement among the major sticking points.

Thomas A. Kochan, a professor of work and employment research at the Sloan School of Management at M.I.T., said the episode showed that "the employees are the most valuable asset in this business."

It showed, too, that the employee action resonated. "A lot of people could relate, and they applauded when they saw these employees standing up to save their business and save the business model," Professor Kochan said.

"Market Basket has done more to educate us on how to manage a business than any business case study that's been written to date," he said.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3deb608e/sc/8/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Cus0Cmarket0Ebasket0Esettlement0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

DealBook: Mobile Sales Lift Alibaba Profit Nearly Threefold, Ahead of 1.P.0.

Credit Mike Clarke/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images Related Links

With less than a month before its initial public offering, the Alibaba Group is intent on showing just how profitable — and focused on mobile — it truly is.

The Chinese e-commerce behemoth disclosed on Wednesday that its profit nearly tripled in the quarter that ended June 30, to $2 billion. Its sales climbed 46 percent, to $2.5 billion.

With its latest performance figures, Alibaba is likely to continue to stoke interest in its hotly anticipated market debut. The stock sale is expected to be one of the biggest ever, raising perhaps $20 billion and signaling the coming-of-age of the Chinese Internet industry as a source of great potential wealth.

Along with the online media conglomerate Tencent and the search engine Baidu, Alibaba has come to dominate its home country's Internet landscape. Its power and formidable profit margins come from its two big e-commerce markets, Taobao and Tmall, as well as other services like online payments. In short, it is part eBay, part Amazon.com and part PayPal, with a hunger to invest in yet more up-and-coming industries.

Alibaba has enjoyed such great success that its own internal valuations of its shares have leapt enormously over the last three years. As of Wednesday, the company valued recent restricted stock grants at $59 a share, giving itself a value of more than $135 billion.

Analysts and people briefed on the matter have suggested that the coming I.P.O. might ultimately value the company at more than $150 billion.

The disclosure on Wednesday precedes the last part of the company's coming-out process. It is expected to announce a slate of important details on its I.P.O., including the expected price range of its shares and which existing investors plan to sell their holdings, as soon as Tuesday, according to people briefed on the matter.

Next will begin a two-week roadshow for prospective investors that will span the globe. That flurry of face-to-face meetings will begin in Asia with two teams of executives, eventually reaching the United States the week of Sept. 8.

Then, if all goes according to plan, it will price its offering and begin trading early in the week of Sept. 15. The company has already secured the ticker symbol BABA and will trade on the New York Stock Exchange.

Photo In China, workers making handbags to be sold on Alibaba's Taobao site.Credit Mark Ralston/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

During their meetings with Alibaba executives, possible new shareholders are sure to ask more questions on the latest results, which reflect continued financial growth. Perhaps more important, however, the company will be more eager to promote the expansion of its mobile offerings.

Nearly a third of Alibaba's gross merchandise volume, or the value of goods sold on Alibaba's marketplaces, comes from mobile transactions, compared with just 12 percent a year ago. And the number of mobile monthly active users rose 15 percent compared with those in the period a year earlier, to 188 million.

In some ways, the shift represents a lesson learned from the last giant Internet I.P.O., that of Facebook. When it went public in the spring of 2012, analysts began to question whether the company was adequately preparing for the explosion in smartphones and tablets, while investors appeared lukewarm on the stock. After all, at the time of its market debut, the site had only just begun to show sponsored posts in users' mobile news feeds.

More recently, however, mobile ad revenue accounted for 62 percent of Facebook's total sales as of the second quarter of this year.

Not all the new numbers were rosy for Alibaba. It disclosed that its operating margin fell to 43.4 percent, from 50.3 percent in the quarter a year earlier. And stripping away one-time gains showed a much less drastic jump in operating income, which rose 26 percent, to $1.1 billion.

And Alibaba continued to emphasize that it would keep on spending money on acquisitions in burgeoning new businesses both in China and the United States. During the last year alone, it bought one of its home country's most successful soccer teams and a web browser. It has also invested in more than a half-dozen American start-ups, including the messaging service Tango and the car-ride app Lyft.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3de7cd4f/sc/2/l/0Ldealbook0Bnytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C270Calibaba0Eprofit0Eand0Emobile0Erevenue0Esoars0Eagain0Eas0Ei0Ep0Eo0Enears0C0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Plugged-1n 0ver Preppy: Teenagers Favor Tech 0ver Clothes

Nicole Myers, 19, outside an Apple store in Midtown Manhattan, said a phone was "a better distraction than clothing." By ELIZABETH A. HARRIS and RACHEL ABRAMS August 27, 2014

For some teenagers, wearing last season's jeans will always be unthinkable.

But a growing number consider texting on a dated smartphone even worse.

For teenage apparel retailers, that screen-obsessed teenager poses a big threat in the still-important back-to-school sales season.

Muscle shirts and strategically ripped jeans no longer provide an assured spot for retailers like Hollister and American Eagle Outfitters in the marketplace of what's cool at an American high school. The social cachet these days involves waving the latest in hand-held technology.

Caitlin Haywood, left, 15, with Richard Reaves, 13, by a Hollister store in SoHo, said a phone lets you shop online. 

"Clothes aren't as important to me," said Olivia D'Amico, a 16-year-old from New York, as she shopped at Hollister with her sister and a friend. "Half the time I don't really buy any brands. I just bought a pair of fake Doc Martens because I don't really care."

She probably spends more on technology because she likes to "stay connected," she said.

"It's definitely more exciting for a lot of teenagers to have a new phone that can do lots of cool stuff than clothing," said Nicole Myers, 19, a model in New York who emerged from an Apple store on Monday with a new iPhone that cost about $200. "A phone keeps you much more entertained. It's a better distraction than clothing."

Analysts and trend-spotters agree that a major shift in teenage trends, and in teenage spending, is underway. John Morris, a retail analyst at BMO Capital Markets, says that his regular focus groups with teenagers about what trends they find most appealing often stray from clothing.

The teenage apparel sector of retailing, whose sales account for about 15 percent of all apparel sales, according to the NPD Group, is in a deep slump.

"You try to get them talking about what's the next look, what they're excited about purchasing in apparel, and the conversation always circles back to the iPhone 6," he said. "You get them talking about crop tops, you get a nice little debate about high-waist going, but the conversation keeps shifting back."

The teenage apparel sector of retailing, whose sales account for about 15 percent of all apparel sales, according to the NPD Group, is in a deep slump as sales have declined over the last several quarters. Aside from the attention given to tech items like phones, apps and accessories, some longstanding retailers have been hard hit by competition from fast-fashion stores like Forever 21 and H&M, which offer up-to-the-minute trends at low prices. Online shopping has also reduced mall traffic among teenage consumers, and the popularity of Instagram whips fads around so quickly that teenagers are not chasing one enduring fashion item.

Young shoppers are the first to point out the use of phones in e-commerce.

"You can shop online for clothes on your phone," Caitlin Haywood, 15, a high school sophomore from New York, said on her way into a Hollister in downtown Manhattan. A fan of the store's "California style," she also noted that she owned many decorative coverings so that she could accessorize her phone.

That's a fashion statement itself, she suggested. "When you take pictures, people see your case," she said.

In fact, accessories like crystal-studded phone cases or neon-colored headphones are high on a teenager's shopping list.

"Having a cool phone to show you're plugged in is a huge part of people's style, a huge part of life these days," said Eva Chen, editor in chief of Lucky Magazine, adding that teenagers used smartphones to signal status in the way men used to do with ornate watches.

A bright spot for teenage retailers might be the economics of the phone market, since most teenagers do not have the money to buy the newest iPhone or Samsung Galaxy the moment it is released.

Stephanie Wissink, a managing director at Piper Jaffray, said that after several years of strong growth, the percentage of money that teenagers spend on electronics appeared to have stabilized at around 8 or 9 percent. Cellphone penetration is high and children must generally wait for their next upgrade for their next device, she said.

But technology does seem to indirectly influence other spending habits, she said. For the first time, Piper Jaffray's semiannual survey of teenagers in the spring found that they spent more money on food — just barely topping clothing — than any other category.

"There's this magnetism to restaurant environments," Ms. Wissink said. "So we talked to teens about why, and it's the free Wi-Fi."

"I'm addicted to Instagram," said Ann Borrero, a 19-year-old who attends high school in Brooklyn and has a running list of the restaurants she often chooses to get Internet access. "I just usually know, like McDonald's always have Wi-Fi, little cafes always have Wi-Fi."

Top executives at traditional retailers have felt the strain of quarter after quarter of disappointing results, and many of those companies have undergone upheaval in their top ranks.

This month, the chief executive of Aéropostale, Thomas P. Johnson, agreed to step down and be succeeded by his predecessor, Julian R. Geiger. In January, the chief executive of American Eagle, Robert L. Hanson, left the company after only two years in the position. And that same month, Abercrombie & Fitch split the role of chairman and chief executive under pressure from investors.

In addition to changes in the teenage-specific landscape, retailers across a range of categories are learning how to manage a back-to-school season that has shifted significantly in recent years. While still a crucial season for retailers, its window has become less delineated, sometimes starting a bit later and often lasting past the beginning of the school year.

"The grave mistake was to annually assume that the back-to-school shopper was going to show up like clockwork in July and buy goods in that time frame," Mr. Morris of BMO said.

Analysts say that retailers appear to have learned that lesson, and have planned their inventory accordingly, often by ordering fewer items and focusing on their margins.

"Back-to-school is important, and people want to have it be successful, but each year, it seems it's a little bit harder to do as well as you did before," said Richard Jaffe, an analyst at Stifel. "The peak becomes less of a peak."

In recent days, executives at a variety of retailers, including Target, Macy's and American Eagle, have given some encouraging signals in their quarterly earnings calls that the back-to-school season is off to a good start. But many experts are calling for a lackluster period regardless.

"Back in the day, we ate three square meals a day, and now what's trending is grazing," Ms. Chen said. "I think shopping is kind of similar. You are constantly shopping throughout the year, and in smaller ways. But I think that's something that affects teens and women — it's a larger trend, period."


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3dea8479/sc/38/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Cbusiness0Cless0Eprep0Emore0Eplugs0Eteenagers0Efavor0Etech0Eover0Eclothes0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm

Machine Learning: Bringing Tech Culture to the Staid College Quad

Video | Saving on College Textbooks There are cheaper ways to get your textbooks for college, they just involve being a better shopper. Sites like Chegg, Bookrenter and Packback allow you to digitally buy or rent books as you need them. August 27, 2014

Molly Wood

MACHINE LEARNING

COLLEGE has its problems. It's expensive, it has some outdated traditions and it has a tendency to produce graduates who struggle to find jobs in the rapidly changing economy.

In the parlance of the tech industry, higher education is ripe for disruption. And Silicon Valley loves to talk about the end of college as we know it, whether by turning everyone into a start-up founder or funneling future students through massive open online courses, or MOOCs.

Still, traditional colleges aren't going away anytime soon and tech entrepreneurs have realized this, too. There are several companies that let students take better advantage of the college education they are getting, instead of the education of the future.

"Learning has been an inefficient market," said Dan Rosensweig, the chief executive of Chegg, an education services company. "The price of books, the diversity of who you can learn from, the geography of where you can learn. It's now getting more and more efficient."

Textbooks have been a particularly ripe target. In a report last year, the Government Accountability Office said the price of new textbooks rose 82 percent from 2002 to 2012, only slightly less than the 89 percent rise in tuition and fees, and far higher than the 28 percent rise in overall consumer prices.

The average student now spends over $600 a year on textbooks and other course-related material, according to the National Association of College Stores. But savvier shopping can probably cut book costs significantly.

Federal law requires colleges to post lists of their required materials online before students arrive on campus. That allows for price comparisons with online stores, especially if the reading is novels or historical works. "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" by Friedrich Nietzsche was available at the University of California, Berkeley, bookstore for about $19 used, but another version was just $6 new at Amazon or free for the Kindle.

Some schools try to push students toward campus bookstores, and some financial aid vouchers are good only at campus stores. But students can and should seek other options when available. And don't forget about the library.

Sites like Chegg.com, Campusbooks.com and Packback offer price-comparison tools for finding better deals on specific textbooks. And there's the option to rent textbooks instead of buying them.

Some university bookstores, like Berkeley's, offer rentals and allow renters to highlight and write notes in the books. Chegg rents textbooks to students, as do sites like Campus Book Rentals and BookRenter.

Amazon offers some textbook rentals, although there are restrictions on what states books can be shipped to.

Packback is trying to improve on the textbook rental idea by offering on-demand digital book rentals for $3 to $5 day. The assumption is that students don't always need a textbook for an entire semester — they may need it only a few times a year.

Kasey Gandham started Packback in 2012 with Mike Shannon, a fellow graduate of Illinois State University, when they were still in college. "It's a no-brainer that textbooks were too expensive," Mr. Gandham said, "but no one was ever really addressing the problem of why they're so expensive to begin with."

Mr. Gandham said textbook prices had entered a vicious cycle: They're expensive, so students buy them used and then resell them as used books for someone else to buy. In those cases, publishers get no revenue and may need to raise prices of their new books to offset fewer sales.

"The solution," he said, "was the thing that was driving up prices."

If students rent digital textbooks through Packback, they can take notes and make highlights in the e-book reader the company created. If they return the books and rent them again, the notes will still be there. And if students find they're renting the book over and over, they can convert what they've already spent toward buying the book outright.

Other companies realize that the entire textbook may not be necessary. A site called Boundless is hoping to upend both books and teaching with a sort of open-sourced approach toward teaching materials. Boundless packages freely available information from public sources like Wikipedia or research papers and offers them as "alternative" textbooks (to the considerable ire of publishers). Students can buy the books for $20.

Boundless also hopes to be a teaching platform. Educators can get texts free, along with course material like quizzes, and then teach directly from these cheaper sources — a kind of disruption from the top down.

Tech entrepreneurs are also building services far beyond textbooks that are meant to help students be smarter college consumers.

One option already known to many students is Chegg, which is evolving from a textbook search and rental site into a full-fledged resource for digitally savvy students.

The company recently acquired InstaEDU, a tutoring service that helps students get immediate access to low-cost tutoring — "Uber for tutors," Mr. Rosensweig of Chegg calls it.

"It democratizes tutoring," he said. "You can get a tutor in any subject, any language, any time of day for as little as 40 cents a minute." And on the flip side, InstaEDU lets college students offer their own tutoring services for up to $20 an hour.

Chegg also offers an internship search engine that matches openings with students' disciplines, location and whether they want to get paid.

There's also a career search with job descriptions, salary ranges and videos of real people explaining what they actually do for a living.

"Less than 50 percent of all college students in this country use their career center, and less than 2 percent get a job from it," Mr. Rosensweig said. "When we launched our service, in six months almost 500,000 students used it."

And sites like Chegg help students keep student loans to a minimum by making it easier to search for grants and scholarships that can offset tuition costs. Such scholarships have always been available, but they're often hard to find, spread out across multiple sources, and the application process can be hard.

In addition to Chegg, Fastweb and StudentScholarshipSearch also centralize scholarships and can even match a user's personal data to the right options.

And in the end, isn't a lot of college about learning to choose the right options? If we're not going to remake college education tomorrow, it is surely worth making the most out of it now.

"Degrees are the currency in America; they're part of our history," says Kim Taylor, founder and chief executive of Ranku, a site that helps prospective students find online degree programs from accredited, nonprofit universities. "The biggest issues in schools is they're in denial that students are consumers."

Not only are students consumers, they're the generation of consumers that expect the web and modern technology to make their lives more efficient and connected. If higher education can't keep up, they'll find other options, and they've got an army of start-ups ready to help.


source : http://rss.nytimes.com/c/34625/f/640316/s/3de9dd6a/sc/36/l/0L0Snytimes0N0C20A140C0A80C280Ctechnology0Cpersonaltech0Cbringing0Etech0Eculture0Eto0Ethe0Estaid0Ecollege0Equad0Bhtml0Dpartner0Frss0Gemc0Frss/story01.htm